Dave Pride
Domain
Domain · Funnel Optimisation

Using trust to grow seller leads

Domain improved agent search card — mobile, with RMA star rating
Metrics

+4pp lead enquiries CSAT 41% → 59% CES 90%

Timeline

1 sprint design/ship 30 days test

Team

PM, Designer, 2 Engineers

My Role
DiscoveryOpportunity prioritisationDesign-to-codeOutcome measurement

The Opportunity

Domain needs to deliver more value to agents.

Agents want more seller leads.

Sellers want trusted agents.

“More leads are always needed — but we have to be across every platform because none of them are great. Feels like fishing but worse: wasting time and money.”

— Agent Partner

“You gotta find a trustworthy one. Sales numbers help, but the reviews are what let me get a sense of the agent. Without them I won’t contact.”

— Potential Seller

Which funnel?

We analysed three seller funnels and found “Find an Agent” had the largest gap between reach and engagement, making it the highest-leverage place to intervene.

FunnelSessionsEnquiriesEngagement
Find an Agent✓ Selected
Property Search
Suburb Insights

Constraints

Speed to test

1 sprint to ship, 1 month to indicative results

No dependencies

Zero cross-team sign-off

Supports tiers

Solution must respect subscription tiers

No new data

Anything needing new data was out of scope

Hypothesis

If we make trust signals more visible within the Find an Agent journey, more sellers will contact agents, increasing total seller lead volume by 2pp over the 30-day test period.

The Solution

Increase trust in the find-an-agent funnel.

Effort vs impact quadrant — Find an Agent selected as the lowest effort, highest impact opportunity

Low effort, zero cross-team sign-off

~75% of enquiry sessions, clear friction points

No new data — RateMyAgent partnership gave verified, immediate review coverage at zero build cost

Component variations respect subscription tiers

The Solution Journey

Stage 1

Before: Low trust design

Ratings hidden. Stats surfaced without third-party proof. Reviews and the enquiry form were decoupled — trust separated from action.

Search results — before
Domain agent search results — before, no star ratings visible
Reviews & enquiry — before
Domain agent reviews and enquiry form — before, decoupled layout
Search card — quick test
Domain agent search card with RateMyAgent star rating — quick test
Reviews & enquiry — quick test
Domain reviews and enquiry form — quick test
Stage 2

Quick Test: Trust validation

RateMyAgent data surfaced in the existing components — no redesign. Same components, new data. Enquiry moved alongside reviews in a two-column layout. A directional test shipped in a single sprint.

Stage 3

Improved: Optimised for conversion

Redesigned components for stronger trust signal. RMA star rating, review count, and verified badge surfaced in the search card at browse. Reviews inline with the enquiry form. Depth scales with subscription tier.

Search card — improved, mobile
Improved agent search card — mobile
Search card — improved, desktop
Improved agent search card — desktop, with RMA star rating and verified badge
Reviews & enquiry — improved
Improved reviews and enquiry form — RMA reviews inline with enquiry, tier-aware

Metrics

CSAT — before (41%)
CSAT survey results before — 41%
CSAT — after (59%)
CSAT survey results after — 59%
CES (90%)
CES survey results — 90%

Outcome

+4pp

seller sales lead enquiries

Measured 30 days post-launch. Indicative, not statistically significant — directionally strong.

90%

CES

Design supported subscription depth

Component variations scaled across subscription tiers without additional build work.

Key Learnings

01

1% changes compound.

De-risk strategic initiatives with ongoing 1% tests, not big bets.

02

Use existing data.

Before building instrumentation, check whether a partner already has the signal — RateMyAgent did.

03

Constraints that map to the goal move you faster at every stage.